Oh yeah there was a lot of “Hayes Code be damned, all of us making this film are queer/friends with queers and we’re going to have some fun with gender identity” in this film. That’s why it still holds up. It’s not a story based around getting a laugh out of dressing men up as women so they can be clowns - there’s an integrity to the cross-dressing. Daphne is an identity Jerry realized he had when he put on a dress. Every time he chooses to keep his wig and outfit on and maintain his feminine mannerisms while alone with Joe, it shows his comfort in this identity, and it elicits laughter from the audience through the dialogue, ie. the audience isn’t laughing at the fact that a man is in a dress, but at the characters as fleshed out characters and human beings. The laughter comes from the situations the characters are put in and their reactions to them, not from a parody of womanhood presented through a male perspective. Similarly, Osgood’s classic line at the end of the film is an affirmation that he likes Jerry as he is, even if he’s Daphne. It’s a way of getting the audience to say, “this is fine, we’re comfortable” through laughter to something socially unacceptable in its time.
Joe’s masculine identity, meanwhile, is used to highlight his misogyny and force him to understand it (and the same with Jerry, but as he’s less of a womanizer, there’s less of a point to be made with him). In a world where men and women often had separate social circles that overlapped only when romance was on the table, putting a man like Joe in a female space where he’s privy to the conversations and emotions that his actions elicit gives him a lot to contend with and understand because he can see the consequences of his actions as raw pain and secondhand, instead of as anger being spewed directly at him. Again, the joke isn’t that he’s a man in a dress, or that he’s parodying womanhood, it’s that as a selfish misogynist he’s put in situations where he’s forced to empathize with the experience of womanhood in order to convincingly enact it for his own safety.
There’s a whole lot more to unpack in the metaphor of these two men having to pass as women because their lives are at stake if they don’t.
Okay so for one of my screenwriting and film studies sections I wrote a paper comparing the language of clothing and feminism from Wilder in two of his films, The Apartment and Some Like it Hot.
Now I am not going to spew out a wall of text on the subject or anything, but I did want to point out that he did not just “sneak things by” the code, he actually deliberately REFUSED to abide by it at all for this film, he willfully refused to even apply for the certification, he knew it wouldn’t pass, and he knew he wouldn’t bend to let it pass.
He and the studio took a gamble that a Wilder-Curtis-Lemmon-Monroe flick would do box office and get play without the “seal of approval” from the code folks.
And he was right.
Hey! If you like this and you like Some Like It Hot; you should know that it was also made into a musical that is currently on tour!
The story has been updated and Daphne is a canonically trans woman (though granted, they do not use the term), and her relationship with Oswald (the man who want to marry her in the above gif set) is played as an unabashed, adorable romance.
They have also updated it to be a more racially accurate depiction of the Jazz club scene, so both Daphne and the Marilyn Monroe character Sugar Kane are both black. Not race blind casting; it’s in the script, and Sugar Kane has a incredible solo on her experience with segregation.
It’s a beautiful, touching, inspiring story, and one of my favorite adaptations, in any medium.
J. Harrison Ghee (shown as Daphne in the YouTube preview) also became one of the first two non-binary actors to win a Tony award! (J. Harrison Ghee won won Best Actor in a Musical and Alex Newell won Best Featured Actor in a Musical for Shucked, both in 2023.)
ok but like. there are two different types of privilege. there’s type a “everybody should have this, but some people don’t” and type b “nobody should have this, but some people do”
there’s having parents who can pay for your application to any college, and then there’s having parents who can bribe your way into any college. there’s owning your own home, and then there’s owning 50 houses and getting rich off hoarding a vital resource. there’s not fearing for your life whenever cops are around, and then there’s being the cop and being allowed to murder anyone at any time.
idk i just feel like that’s an important distinction to make.
USA people! Buy NOTHING Feb 28 2025. Not anything. 24 hours. No spending. Buy the day before or after but nothing. NOTHING. February 28 2025. Not gas. Not milk. Not something on a gaming app. Not a penny spent. (Only option in a crisis is local small mom and pop. Nothing. Else.) Promise me. Commit. 1 day. 1 day to scare the shit out of them that they don’t get to follow the bullshit executive orders. They don’t get to be cowards. If they do, it costs. It costs.
Then, if you can join me for Phase 2. March 7 2025 thtough March 14 2025? No Amazon. None. 1 week. No orders. Not a single item. Not one ebook. Nothing. 1 week. Just 1.
If you live outside the USA boycott US products on February 28 2025 and stand in solidarity with us and also join us for the week of no Amazon.
‘This won’t work, this isn’t widespread, nobody knows, we’re in a bubble, blah blah blah’ my mom, a 64 year old lady with no social media whose first language is spanish, told me about this before tumblr did, and said we are going to participate.
I used to be so smart. I was so clever and I was so capable of engaging in discussions and spinning ideas out with people and considering concepts and comprehending hypotheticals I was so SMART I was so GOOD AT WORDS I could put words together for hours and I didn’t run out of them. I didn’t know more things but I could think… I could think. I had space inside for so many thoughts and concepts. I was so clever
[ID person with a pan labeled “chronic illness” using it to bash another pan, labeled “mental health” and held upright. The first pan absolutely flattens the second one, curling in on itself with each hit, until it is quickly rolled and unusable]
